On April 9, 2016 12:43:03 PM PDT, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
>On 2016-04-09 22:38:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
>> There are results with 5364b357 reverted.
>Crazy that this has such a negative impact. Amit, can you reproduce
>that? Alexander, I guess for r/w workload 5364b357 is a benefit on that
>machine as well?

How sure are you about these measurements? Because there really shouldn't be 
clog lookups one a steady state is reached...

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to