On April 9, 2016 12:43:03 PM PDT, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >On 2016-04-09 22:38:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >> There are results with 5364b357 reverted. > >Crazy that this has such a negative impact. Amit, can you reproduce >that? Alexander, I guess for r/w workload 5364b357 is a benefit on that >machine as well?
How sure are you about these measurements? Because there really shouldn't be clog lookups one a steady state is reached... Andres -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
