On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On April 9, 2016 12:43:03 PM PDT, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de>
> >On 2016-04-09 22:38:31 +0300, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >> There are results with 5364b357 reverted.
> >Crazy that this has such a negative impact. Amit, can you reproduce
> >that? Alexander, I guess for r/w workload 5364b357 is a benefit on that
> >machine as well?
> How sure are you about these measurements?
I'm pretty sure. I've retried it multiple times by hand before re-run the
> Because there really shouldn't be clog lookups one a steady state is
Hm... I'm also surprised. There shouldn't be clog lookups once hint bits
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company