Andres Freund wrote: > I'm kinda inclined to apply that portion (or just the whole patch with > the spurious #ifdef 0 et al fixed) into 9.6; and add the necessary > checks in a few places. Because I really think this is likely to hit > unsuspecting users.
Advertising
!!! Be sure to consult with the RMT before doing anything of the sort. It might as well decide to revert the whole patch. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
