On 2016-04-12 23:52:14 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andres Freund wrote: > > > I'm kinda inclined to apply that portion (or just the whole patch with > > the spurious #ifdef 0 et al fixed) into 9.6; and add the necessary > > checks in a few places. Because I really think this is likely to hit > > unsuspecting users. > > !!! > > Be sure to consult with the RMT before doing anything of the sort.
I didn't plan to do anything without a few +1's. I don't think we can release with the state of things as is though. I don't see a less intrusive way than to get rid of that spinlock on all platforms capable of significant concurrency. So, RMT, what are your thoughts on this? Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
