> Second, I don't think it will improve and become performant without > exposure to a wider audience.
Huh? The issue is a relatively simple to spot architectural issue (taking a single exclusive lock during snapshot acquiration which only needs shared locks otherwise) - I don't see how any input it's needed. And for that matter, I don't see why such a lock got through review. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
