On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Anyway, who agrees with the overall design of pglogical and who does not?
I haven't spent very much time on it yet. I tend to prefer the idea of integrating it more deeply into core and adding SQL syntax around it, but I'm not going to fight tooth and nail for that if a contrary consensus emerges. I think this would be a good topic to discuss at PGCon. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
