On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> I think it'd be better to match the comment with that for
>>> create_foreignscan_path().  So how about "ForeignPath represents a
>>> potential scan of a foreign table, foreign join, or foreign upper-relation
>>> processing"?  I think we would probably need to update the comment in
>>> src/backend/optimizer/README (L358), too.
>> That's a lot better.  Updated patch attached.
> Looks OK to me, too.  Committed.


- Amit

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to