Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> If we assume that oldstyle functions returning integer are still okay, >> which the success of the regression test case involving oldstyle_length() >> seems to prove, then indeed seg's bool-returning functions are the only >> hazard.
> Your assumption is right. With the patch attached for contrib/seg/ > that converts all those functions to use the V1 declaration, I am able > to make the tests pass. As the internal shape of the functions is not > changed and that there are no functional changes, I guess that it > would be fine to backpatch down to where VS2015 is intended to be > supported. Is anybody here foreseeing any problems for back-branches > if there is such a change? It should be fine, since converting a function to V1 makes no difference at the SQL level --- we don't need an extension script modification. How far back are we thinking of supporting VS2015, anyway? I can check and push this as a separate patch. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers