On 2016-04-22 19:25:06 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Since we haven't, maybe nobody cares, so why should we?
I guess it's to a good degree because netbsd has pg packages, and it's
> would rename our function nonetheless FWIW; the name seems far too
> generic to me.
I think that's what Thomas did upthread. Are you taking this one then?
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: