On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 02:03:01PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:00 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > > Could you describe the test case in sufficient detail for Teodor to > > reproduce > > your results? > > [detailed description and attachments]
Thanks. > The more I think about it, the more I think gin is just an innocent > bystander, for which I just happen to have a particularly demanding > test. I think something about snapshots and wrap-around may be > broken. Based on your review, I think the next step on $subject is for Teodor to either commit gin_alone_cleanup-4.patch or to tell us what he'd like to see or do before committing that patch. While the failures during your crash recovery testing may not even be 9.6 regressions, they suggest the presence of serious bugs. At a minimum, the community should confirm they are not 9.6 regressions before releasing 9.6. I have added an open item to that effect. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
