On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> A customer of ours was unable to pg_upgrade a database, with this error:
>   old and new databases "postgres" have a mismatched number of relations
>   Failure, exiting
> After some research, it turned out that pg_largeobject had acquired a
> toast table.  After some more research, we determined that it was
> because right after initdb of the old database (months or years prior)
> they moved pg_largeobject to another, slower tablespace, because for
> their case it is very bulky and not used as much as the other data.
> (This requires restarting postmaster with the -O parameter).
> While I understand that manual system catalog modifications are frowned
> upon, it seems to me that we should handle this better.  The failure is
> very confusing and hard to diagnose, and hard to fix also.

I think that if you use -O, and it breaks something, you get to keep
both pieces.  pg_largeobject is a big problem, and we should replace
it with something better.  And maybe in the meantime we should support
moving it to a different tablespace.  But if it's not officially
supported and you do it anyway, I don't think it's pg_upgrade's job to

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to