On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any thoughts what to do with this? We could decide that it's a bug fix
>> and backpatch, or decide that it's a new feature and delay till 9.7,
>> or decide that it's a minor bug fix and add it to 9.6 only. I kinda lean
>> towards the last alternative.
> How about backpatching patch 1 all the way back, and putting the others
> in 9.6?
Why would we do that? It seems very odd to back-patch a pure
refactoring - isn't that taking a risk for no benefit?
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: