On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Any thoughts what to do with this? We could decide that it's a bug fix >> and backpatch, or decide that it's a new feature and delay till 9.7, >> or decide that it's a minor bug fix and add it to 9.6 only. I kinda lean >> towards the last alternative. > > How about backpatching patch 1 all the way back, and putting the others > in 9.6?
Why would we do that? It seems very odd to back-patch a pure refactoring - isn't that taking a risk for no benefit? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
