On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Any thoughts what to do with this?  We could decide that it's a bug fix
>> and backpatch, or decide that it's a new feature and delay till 9.7,
>> or decide that it's a minor bug fix and add it to 9.6 only.  I kinda lean
>> towards the last alternative.
> How about backpatching patch 1 all the way back, and putting the others
> in 9.6?

Why would we do that?  It seems very odd to back-patch a pure
refactoring - isn't that taking a risk for no benefit?

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to