Robert Haas wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenre...@gmx.de> > wrote: > >> Amit Kapila writes: > >>> Sounds good. So can we assume that you will try to get us the new report > >>> with more information? > > > > I don't see these crashes anymore in c1543a8. By the amount of fuzzing > > done it should have happened a dozen times, so it's highly likely > > something in 23b09e15..c1543a8 fixed it. > > Hmm, I'd guess c45bf5751b6338488bd79ce777210285531da373 to be the most > likely candidate.
I thought so too, but then that patch change things in the planner side, but it seems to me that the reported crash is in the executor, unless I'm misreading. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
