Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 3 May 2016 at 18:07, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Or at least, it did until Simon decided that ALTER TABLE RESET >> doesn't require AccessExclusiveLock.
> On reflection, this still seems like a good idea. Yes, what pg_upgrade was doing was clearly a hack, and not a very nice one. > I accept that it is my bug and should fix it. It's moot at this point, see 1a2c17f8e. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers