* Andres Freund (and...@anarazel.de) wrote: > On 2016-05-03 12:07:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > I think possibly the easiest fix for this is to have pg_upgrade, > > instead of RESETting a nonexistent option, RESET something that's > > still considered to require AccessExclusiveLock. "user_catalog_table" > > would work, looks like; though I'd want to annotate its entry in > > reloptions.c to warn people away from downgrading its lock level. > > Alternatively we could just add a function for adding a toast table - > that seems less hacky and less likely to be broken in the future.
+1 Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature