On 7 May 2016 at 16:49, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon Riggs <[email protected]> writes: > > On 3 May 2016 at 18:07, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Or at least, it did until Simon decided that ALTER TABLE RESET > >> doesn't require AccessExclusiveLock. > > > On reflection, this still seems like a good idea. > > Yes, what pg_upgrade was doing was clearly a hack, and not a very nice one. > > > I accept that it is my bug and should fix it. > > It's moot at this point, see 1a2c17f8e. >
OK, sorry for the noise and thanks for the fix. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ <http://www.2ndquadrant.com/> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
