On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 01:50:39PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > I also want to reiterate that I didn't immediately call for a revert, > initially - before recognizing the architectural issue - I offered to > write code to address the regressions due to the spinlocks.
I was the same case --- I didn't call for the patch to be reverted, but rather considered for reversion: "I also strongly question whether we should revert this feature ..." -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
