Joshua D. Drake wrote: > On 05/16/2016 06:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > > >>Alvaro, > >> > >>Thank you for bringing this to light. Is there a contributor FAQ for > >>PgLogical so that people can help? > > > >Hmm, I don't think there's any contributor FAQ. It's supposed to be a > >regular patch submission, after all -- it needs user interface review, a > >review of the communication protocol, tests, code-level review, etc. > > O.k. so we should discuss all PgLogical things here and not on Github? I am > just trying to figure out what the proper mode here is. I don't think > anybody wants us to double up efforts.
As far as I am concerned, by all means ignore Github and discuss issues in pgsql-hackers. Github is being used only because it provides a convenient Git mirror, which is said to be easier to use than attaching huge patches back and forth. I think it may be more convenient also to keep track of issues people have reported so that they can be marked as fixed in commit messages, etc. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
