Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 5/20/16 7:37 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I guess my first question is whether we have consensus on the release
>> into which we should put this. Some people (Noah, among others)
>> thought it should wait because we're after feature freeze, while
>> others thought we should do it now. If we're going to try to get this
>> into 9.6, I'll work on reviewing this sooner rather than later, but if
>> we're not going to do that I'm going to postpone dealing with it until
>> after we branch.
> Sounds to me that this is part of the cleanup of a 9.6 feature and
> should be in that release.
Yes, let's fix it. This will also take care of the questions about
whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require
module version bumps.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
