On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 1:51 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 11:45 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Yes, let's fix it. This will also take care of the questions about >>> whether the GIN/GIST opclass tweaks I made a few months ago require >>> module version bumps. > >> Tom, there's a patch for this at >> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/574f091a.3050...@proxel.se which >> I think you should review, since you were the one who made the tweaks >> involved. Any chance you can do that RSN? If we want to get this >> done at all, we should really get it into beta2. Also, the patches >> Andreas posted for applying parallel-safety markings apply on top of >> that, so that needs to go in first, at least for the affected modules. > > OK, I'll take it. You're done with Andreas' patches otherwise?
Advertising
No. I can go through the unaffected ones in the meantime, though, and then come back to the affected ones after you deal with this. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
