Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: > I would be in favor of rewriting it to a LATERAL, but that would not be > backwards compatible entirely either IIUC.
It could be made so, I think, but it may be more trouble than it's worth; see my previous message. > I'll also note that, unless I missed something, we also have to consider > that the capability to pipeline results is still only available in the > target list. Yes, we would definitely want to improve nodeFunctionscan.c to perform better for ValuePerCall SRFs. But that has value independently of this. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers