Tom Lane wrote: > Joe Conway <m...@joeconway.com> writes: > > I'll also note that, unless I missed something, we also have to consider > > that the capability to pipeline results is still only available in the > > target list. > > Yes, we would definitely want to improve nodeFunctionscan.c to perform > better for ValuePerCall SRFs. But that has value independently of this.
Ah, so that's what "pipeline results" mean! I hadn't gotten that. I agree; Abhijit had a patch or a plan for this, a long time ago ... -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
