Re: Michael Paquier 2016-05-24 
<CAB7nPqQRXsC8=ozh6GpjLnpZ=meoouzoaabzx28n2bjsmv2...@mail.gmail.com>
> Yeah, that's really something that covers only a narrow case, though
> if we don't have it when we need it we're limited to some hacks.
> Perhaps people who have the advanced level to use such a thing have
> the level to use hacks anyway..

I'd think recovery_target_lsn would be more useful in practice than
the existing recovery_target_xid. So I don't see why it shouldn't just
be added, also given it's likely very unobtrusive to do so.

Christoph


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to