Re: Michael Paquier 2016-05-24 <CAB7nPqQRXsC8=ozh6GpjLnpZ=meoouzoaabzx28n2bjsmv2...@mail.gmail.com> > Yeah, that's really something that covers only a narrow case, though > if we don't have it when we need it we're limited to some hacks. > Perhaps people who have the advanced level to use such a thing have > the level to use hacks anyway..
I'd think recovery_target_lsn would be more useful in practice than the existing recovery_target_xid. So I don't see why it shouldn't just be added, also given it's likely very unobtrusive to do so. Christoph -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
