Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Paquier 2016-05-24 
> <CAB7nPqQRXsC8=ozh6GpjLnpZ=meoouzoaabzx28n2bjsmv2...@mail.gmail.com>
> > Yeah, that's really something that covers only a narrow case, though
> > if we don't have it when we need it we're limited to some hacks.
> > Perhaps people who have the advanced level to use such a thing have
> > the level to use hacks anyway..
> 
> I'd think recovery_target_lsn would be more useful in practice than
> the existing recovery_target_xid. So I don't see why it shouldn't just
> be added, also given it's likely very unobtrusive to do so.

Also, see
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56bd0e4e.5050...@2ndquadrant.com

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to