Christoph Berg wrote: > Re: Michael Paquier 2016-05-24 > <CAB7nPqQRXsC8=ozh6GpjLnpZ=meoouzoaabzx28n2bjsmv2...@mail.gmail.com> > > Yeah, that's really something that covers only a narrow case, though > > if we don't have it when we need it we're limited to some hacks. > > Perhaps people who have the advanced level to use such a thing have > > the level to use hacks anyway.. > > I'd think recovery_target_lsn would be more useful in practice than > the existing recovery_target_xid. So I don't see why it shouldn't just > be added, also given it's likely very unobtrusive to do so.
Also, see http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/56bd0e4e.5050...@2ndquadrant.com -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
