В письме от 25 мая 2016 13:25:38 Вы написали:
> Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> > >This all should me moved behind "access method" abstraction...
> > 
> > +1 relopt_kind should be moved in am, at least. Or removed.
> Hm, but we have tablespace options too, so I'm not sure that using AM as
> abstraction level is correct.
We will use am for all indexes, and keep all the rest in relopotion.c for 
non-indexes. May be divided options catalog into sections one section for each 

And as I also would like to use this code for dynamic attoptions later, I 
would like to remove relopt_kind at all. Because it spoils live in that case.

Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to