Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > I've largely given up hope of coming up with an alternative that can > attract more than one vote and that is also at least mildly accurate, > but one idea is max_parallel_workers_per_gather_node. That will be > totally clear.
Given the reference to Gather nodes, couldn't you drop the word "parallel"? "node" might not be necessary either. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers