On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote: >> >> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is >> not *only* a list of names anymore. >> >> synchronous_standby_config? >> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)? > > > If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave it > as is.
+1, emphatically. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers