On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> [Action required within 72 hours.  This is a generic notification.]
>> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item.  Robert,
>> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
>> item.  If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
>> 9.6 open item, please let us know.  Otherwise, please observe the policy on
>> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this
>> message.  Include a date for your subsequent status update.  Testers may
>> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
>> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1.  Consequently, I will appreciate your
>> efforts toward speedy resolution.  Thanks.
> Discussion of this issue is still ongoing.  Accordingly, I intend to
> wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further.
> I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update
> by then.

Ashutosh seemed OK with the latest patch.


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to