On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:41 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> [Action required within 72 hours. This is a generic notification.] >> >> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 9.6 open item. Robert, >> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open >> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a >> 9.6 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on >> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within 72 hours of this >> message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may >> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed >> well in advance of shipping 9.6rc1. Consequently, I will appreciate your >> efforts toward speedy resolution. Thanks. > > Discussion of this issue is still ongoing. Accordingly, I intend to > wait until that discussion has concluded before proceeding further. > I'll check this thread again no later than Friday and send an update > by then.
Although I have done a bit of review of this patch, it needs more thought than I have so far had time to give it. I will update again by Tuesday. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
