On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 5:23 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Considering above analysis is correct, we have below options: >> > a. Modify the test such that it actually generates an error and to hide >> > the >> > context, we can exception block and raise some generic error. >> > b. Modify the test such that it actually generates an error and to hide >> > the >> > context, we can use force_parallel_mode = regress; >> >> Either of those sounds okay. No need to raise a generic error; one can >> raise >> SQLERRM to keep the main message and not the context. I lean toward (a) >> so we >> have nonzero test coverage of force_parallel_mode=on. > > Patch implementing option (a) attached with this mail.
OK, committed. I also changed "select" to "perform" per your analysis. I wonder if we need to revisit the choices I made inside PL/pgsql and see why CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK is not being set here. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers