On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I'm tempted to do is trying to document that, as a point of
> policy, parallel query in 9.6 uses up to (workers + 1) times the
> resources that a single session might use.  That includes not only CPU
> but also things like work_mem and temp file space.  This obviously
> isn't ideal, but it's what could be done by the ship date.

Where would that be documented, though? Would it need to be noted in
the case of each such GUC?

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to