On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Since Peter doesn't seem in a hurry to produce a patch for this issue, > I wrote one. It is attached. I'll commit this in a day or two if > nobody objects.
Sorry about the delay. Your patch seems reasonable, but I thought we'd also want to change "per session" to "per session (with an additional temp_file_limit allowance within each parallel worker)" for temp_file_limit. I think it's worthwhile noting this for temp_file_limit specifically, since it's explicitly a per session limit, whereas users are quite used to the idea that work_mem might be doled out multiple times for multiple executor nodes. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers