Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes: > There was also that (old) thread about making the recovery.conf parameters > be general GUCs. I don't actually remember the consensus there, but diong > that would certainly change how it's handled as well.
It strikes me that keeping a password embedded in the conninfo from being exposed might be quite a bit harder/riskier if it became a GUC. Something to keep in mind if we ever try to make that change ... regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers