Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> There was also that (old) thread about making the recovery.conf parameters
> be general GUCs. I don't actually remember the consensus there, but diong
> that would certainly change how it's handled as well.

It strikes me that keeping a password embedded in the conninfo from being
exposed might be quite a bit harder/riskier if it became a GUC.  Something
to keep in mind if we ever try to make that change ...

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to