On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Fujii Masao wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Michael Paquier >>> <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >> >>> >> ISTM that we will never be able to get out of this loop if walreceiver >>> >> fails to connect to the master (e.g., password is wrong) after we enter >>> >> this loop. >>> > >>> > Wouldn't it be cleaner to just return an error here instead of retrying? >>> >>> I prefer to return NULL. Now NULL is returned when walreceiver's pid is 0. >>> We can just change this logic so that NULL is returned pid is 0 OR the >>> flag is false. >> >> For the conninfo only, or for everything? > > All of them. If this connstr is not ready for display, the WAL > receiver does not have a proper connection yet, so there is nothing > worth showing anyway to the user.
+1 Regards, -- Fujii Masao -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
