> From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Paquier
> So perhaps the best answer, is not 1 nor 2. Just saying that the routines
> are carefully maintained with a best effort, though sometimes you may need
> to rebuild depending on unavoidable changes in routine signatures that had
> to be introduced.
Good, I'd like to use that "mild" expression in the manual. Although the
expression is mild, the reality for users is not, is it?
Because the UDF developers and users cannot easily or correctly determine if
rebuilding is necessary, nervous (enterprise) users will rebuild their UDFs
with each minor release for the maximum safety as Michael does.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: