On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Grittner <kgri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 09:00:45AM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote: > >>> I have been looking at several possible fixes, and weighing the >>> pros and cons of each. I expect to post a patch later today. >> >> This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly >> send >> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent >> status >> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership: >> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.ga447...@tornado.leadboat.com > > Attached is a patch which fixes this issue, which I will push > Monday unless there are objections.
Considering that (1) this was posted on a weekend and (2) that Monday is also a US holiday and (3) that we are not about to wrap a release, I think you should postpone the proposed commit date by a few days to allow time for review. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
