On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > In the interest of clarity, I was not intending to say that there > should be a regression test in the patch. I was intending to say that > there should be a test case with the bug report. I'm not opposed to > adding a regression test, and I like the idea of attempting to do so > while requiring only a relatively small amount of data by changing > maintenance_work_mem, but that wasn't the target at which I was > aiming. Nevertheless, carry on.
How do you feel about adding testing to tuplesort.c not limited to hitting this bug (when Valgrind memcheck is used)? Are you satisfied that I have adequately described steps to reproduce? -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
