* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > I agree with removing the source code field, though I did like the > > suggestion mentioned elsewhere for having it shown when it's just a C > > symbol but not otherwise. If we can find a way to have the C symbol > > shown when it's a C or internal function, I'm fine with that, but the > > source code field having entier pl/sql and pl/pgsql functions in it > > doesn't work and \sf should be used instead. > > It would certainly be easy enough to do that, as long as you don't mind > hard-wiring into psql the knowledge that "internal" and "C" are the > languages to show prosrc for. "Source code" would no longer be a very > appropriate column name, though it already was not for these cases. > I'd be inclined to call it "Internal name" instead.
That would certainly work for me. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
