amatv...@bitec.ru writes: > Is there any plan to implement "session per thread" or "shared > sessions between thread"?
No, not really. The amount of overhead that would add --- eg, the need for locking on what used to be single-use caches --- makes the benefit highly questionable. Also, most people who need this find that sticking a connection pooler in front of the database solves their problem, so there's not that much motivation to do a ton of work inside the database to solve it there. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers