> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> amatv...@bitec.ru writes:
>>> Is  there  any  plan  to  implement  "session  per  thread" or "shared
>>> sessions between thread"?
>> so
>> there's not that much motivation to do a ton of work inside the database
>> to solve it there.

> I agree that there's not really a plan to implement this, but I don't
> ...

> So, I actually think it would be a good idea to think about this.

I just want to note that converting global variables to  thread-specific 
It's large work offcourse.
But it's not seemed to be a ton of work.
And it's the most part of refactoring for  "session  per  thread".
Offcourse that's not all.
But it  seemed to be the most valuable reason not to do that work.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to