On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK, I am doing that at the end. > > And also while moving on... > > On another topic, here are some ideas to extend CREATE/ALTER ROLE to > support SCRAM password directly: > 1) protocol PASSWORD value, where protocol is { MD5 | PLAIN | SCRAM }, giving: > CREATE ROLE foorole SCRAM PASSWORD value; > 2) PASSWORD (protocol) value. > 3) Just add SCRAM PASSWORD > My mind is thinking about 1) as being the cleanest solution as this > does not touch the defaults, which may change a couple of releases > later. Other opinions?
I can't really understand what you are saying here, but I'm going to be -1 on adding SCRAM as a parser keyword. Let's pick a syntax like "PASSWORD SConst USING SConst" or "PASSWORD SConst ENCRYPTED WITH SConst". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers