On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> You missed the "compelling argument why it's needed" part. What is the
> need for this?
It's self-evident that this thread wouldn't exist if it were not the
case that people had queries that no longer work because of these new
changes. You can hold your breath and pretend that every single one
of those queries is probably misdesigned, but I do not think anyone
else will find that argument convincing.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: