* Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johns...@gmail.com> writes: > > I suspect I'll end up using 10.x somewhat frequently though I'm mostly on > > the lists. I suspect the choice will be dependent on context and channel. > > Hmm, that seems like a workable answer as well, and one that's traceable > to our past habits.
For my 2c, I'd kind of prefer v10, but I could live with 10.x. Not sure that I have any real reason for that preference other than 'v10' is slightly shorter and seems more 'right', to me. Perhaps because '10.x' implies a *released* version to me (10.1, 10.2, 10.3), whereas you asked about a *branch*, which would generally include some patches past the latest point release. In other words, "are you going to back-patch this to 10.x?" doesn't seem quite right, whereas "are you going to back-patch this to v10?" lines up correctly in my head, but I don't hold that distinction very closely and either would work. Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
