On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 02:07:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:57:35AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > >> On 8/2/16 12:51 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> > Yes, that's a strong argument for using a space. I have adjusted the > >> > patch to use spaces in all reasonable places. Patch attached, which I > >> > have gzipped because it was 133 KB. (Ah, see what I did there?) :-) > >> > > >> > I am thinking of leaving the 9.6 docs alone as I have already made them > >> > consistent (no space) with minimal changes. We can make it consistent > >> > the other way in PG 10. > >> > >> I don't think anyone wanted to *remove* the spaces in the documentation. > >> I think this change makes the documentation harder to read. > > > > Well, we had spaces in only a few places in the docs, and as I said, it > > is not consistent. Do you want those few put back for 9.6? > > +1 for that. I can't see how it's good for 10 to be one way, 9.6 to > be the opposite way, and 9.5 and prior to be someplace in the middle. > That seems like a back-patching mess.
OK, done. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
