Greg Stark <[email protected]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Tom Lane <[email protected]> wrote:
>> pointing out that "SELECT 42 ISNULL" is now ambiguous.  Since ISNULL
>> is nonstandard, maybe dropping support for it would be feasible.

> Isn't ISNULL one of the lexical tricks we used to effectively give
> bison two token lookahead?

No, it's a SQL-exposed feature, though I think it's just there for
compatibility with some random other DBMS.  See also NOTNULL.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to