Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera > <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I too prefer to keep it turned off in 9.6 and consider enabling it by >> default on a future release (10 is probably good). Interested users can >> carefully test the feature without endangering other unsuspecting users. >> I agree with the idea of keeping it enabled in master, so that it'll get >> a modicum of testing there by hackers, too.
> Sounds like that is the consensus. Who's going to implement it? I believe we're talking about reverting 77cd477c4 (in 9.6 only not master), correct? It's a little harder than just "git revert" because of the subsequent max_parallel_degree -> max_parallel_workers_per_gather name change, but still not exactly rocket science. Since 77cd477c4 was your commit, I'd sort of expect you to do the honors, but if you don't want to I can. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers