Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> I too prefer to keep it turned off in 9.6 and consider enabling it by
>> default on a future release (10 is probably good). Interested users can
>> carefully test the feature without endangering other unsuspecting users.
>> I agree with the idea of keeping it enabled in master, so that it'll get
>> a modicum of testing there by hackers, too.
> Sounds like that is the consensus. Who's going to implement it?
I believe we're talking about reverting 77cd477c4 (in 9.6 only not
master), correct? It's a little harder than just "git revert" because
of the subsequent max_parallel_degree -> max_parallel_workers_per_gather
name change, but still not exactly rocket science.
Since 77cd477c4 was your commit, I'd sort of expect you to do the
honors, but if you don't want to I can.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
