On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> I too prefer to keep it turned off in 9.6 and consider enabling it by >>> default on a future release (10 is probably good). Interested users can >>> carefully test the feature without endangering other unsuspecting users. >>> I agree with the idea of keeping it enabled in master, so that it'll get >>> a modicum of testing there by hackers, too. > >> Sounds like that is the consensus. Who's going to implement it? > > I believe we're talking about reverting 77cd477c4 (in 9.6 only not > master), correct? It's a little harder than just "git revert" because > of the subsequent max_parallel_degree -> max_parallel_workers_per_gather > name change, but still not exactly rocket science. > > Since 77cd477c4 was your commit, I'd sort of expect you to do the > honors, but if you don't want to I can.
OK, I'll do it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers