On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:10 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> I too prefer to keep it turned off in 9.6 and consider enabling it by
>>> default on a future release (10 is probably good).  Interested users can
>>> carefully test the feature without endangering other unsuspecting users.
>>> I agree with the idea of keeping it enabled in master, so that it'll get
>>> a modicum of testing there by hackers, too.
>> Sounds like that is the consensus.  Who's going to implement it?
> I believe we're talking about reverting 77cd477c4 (in 9.6 only not
> master), correct?  It's a little harder than just "git revert" because
> of the subsequent max_parallel_degree -> max_parallel_workers_per_gather
> name change, but still not exactly rocket science.
> Since 77cd477c4 was your commit, I'd sort of expect you to do the
> honors, but if you don't want to I can.

OK, I'll do it.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to