On 8/18/16 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
This seems pretty dubious to me, in particular that the identical -T option will be passed willy-nilly into the pg_dump runs for every database. That seems more likely to be a foot-gun than something useful.
I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be *) with the specifiers would solve that issue.
Also, if we believe that this has a safe use-case, why only -T, and not pg_dump's other object selectivity options?
+1. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com 855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers