Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > On 8/18/16 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> This seems pretty dubious to me, in particular that the identical -T >> option will be passed willy-nilly into the pg_dump runs for every >> database. That seems more likely to be a foot-gun than something useful.
> I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be > *) with the specifiers would solve that issue. Hmm, something like "-T dbname1:pattern1 -T dbname2:pattern2" ? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers