Jim Nasby <[email protected]> writes:
> On 8/18/16 2:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> This seems pretty dubious to me, in particular that the identical -T
>> option will be passed willy-nilly into the pg_dump runs for every
>> database. That seems more likely to be a foot-gun than something useful.
> I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be
> *) with the specifiers would solve that issue.
Hmm, something like "-T dbname1:pattern1 -T dbname2:pattern2" ?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
