On 8/18/16 5:01 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I agree, but I think mandating a database name (which I suppose could be
> *) with the specifiers would solve that issue.
Hmm, something like "-T dbname1:pattern1 -T dbname2:pattern2" ?
Bingo. Hopefully there'd be some way to consolidate the code between the
two as well...
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532) mobile: 512-569-9461
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: